Journal: Frontiers in Microbiology
Article Title: The HBV Core Protein and Core Particle Both Bind to the PPiase Par14 and Par17 to Enhance Their Stabilities and HBV Replication
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.795047
Figure Lengend Snippet: The S19 and E46/D74 residues of Par14 and S44 and E71/D99 residues of Par17 promote recruitment of HBc into cccDNA via the HBc RP motif. (A) Overexpressed Par14 and Par17 increase recruitment of HBc into cccDNA. Vector- (lane 2), Par14- (lane 3), and Par17-transduced (lane 4) HepG2-hNTCP-C9 cells were infected with 1.7 × 10 3 GEq of HBV WT. Mock-infected HepG2-hNTCP-C9 cells were used a negative control (lane 1). (B) PIN4 KD reduces binding of HBc to cccDNA. HepG2-hNTCP-C9-shControl (lane 3), HepG2-hNTCP-C9-shPIN4-#1 (lane 4), and HepG2-hNTCP-C9-shPIN4-#5 (lane 5) cells were infected with HBV as described above. HepG2 cells were infected (lane 1) and HepG2-hNTCP cells were mock-infected (lane 2) as negative controls. (C,D) Substrate- and DNA-binding residues of Par14 (E46/D74 and S19, respectively) and Par17 (E71/D99 and S44, respectively) are important for enhanced recruitment of HBc into cccDNA. HepG2-hNTCP-C9 cells were plated as described above and mock-transfected (lane 1) or transfected with 3 × FLAG (lane 2), 3 × FLAG-Par14 WT (lane 3), 3 × FLAG-Par14-E46A/D74A (lane 4), 3 × FLAG-Par14-S19E (lane 5), 3 × FLAG-Par17 WT (lane 6), 3 × FLAG-Par17-E71A/D99A (lane 7), or 3 × FLAG-Par17-S44E (lane 8) (C) . HepG2-hNTCP-C9 (lane 1), HepG2-hNTCP-C9-shControl (lane 2), and HepG2-hNTCP-C9-shPIN4-#1 (lanes 3–10) cells were seeded as described above. As additional controls, HepG2-hNTCP-C9-shPIN4-#1 cells were mock-transfected (lane 3) or transfected with 3 × FLAG (lane 4). HepG2-hNTCP-C9-shPIN4-#1 cells were transfected with 3 × FLAG-Par14 WT (lane 5), 3 × FLAG-Par14-E46A/D74A (lane 6), 3 × FLAG-Par14-S19E (lane 7), 3 × FLAG-Par17 WT (lane 8), 3 × FLAG-Par17-E71A/D99A (lane 9), or 3 × FLAG-Par17-S44E (lane 10) (D) . (E,F) The HBc RP motif is critical for recruitment of HBc into cccDNA. HepG2-hNTCP-C9 (lane 1), HepG2-hNTCP-C9-shControl (lanes 2 and 3), and HepG2-hNTCP-C9-shPIN4-#1 (lanes 4 and 5) cells were infected with HBV WT (lanes 2 and 4) or HBV-HBc-AAP mutant (lanes 3 and 5) virions at 1.7 × 10 3 GEq per cell as detailed in the “Materials and Methods” section. (G) The HBc CTD is important for recruitment of HBc into cccDNA. HepG2-hNTCP-C9 (lane 1), HepG2-hNTCP-C9-shControl (lane 2), and HepG2-hNTCP-C9 PIN4 -KD (lane 3) cells were used as controls. HepG2-hNTCP-C9 PIN4 -KD cells were co-transfected with 3 × FLAG plus HBc WT (lane 4), the HBc CTD-deficient construct (lane 5), 3 × FLAG-Par14 WT plus HBc WT (lane 6) or the HBc CTD-deficient construct (lane 7), or 3 × FLAG-Par17 WT plus HBc WT (lane 8) or the HBc CTD-deficient construct (lane 9). HepG2-hNTCP-C9-shControl (lane 2) and HepG2-hNTCP-C9 PIN4 -KD (lanes 3–9) cells were infected with HBV as described above. At 9 days p.i., chromatin solutions were prepared as described previously [35] and subjected to immunoprecipitation with an anti-PIN4, anti-FLAG, anti-HBc, anti-RNA polymerase II (Abcam #ab817), anti-acetyl H3 (Merck Millipore #06–599), or anti-H3 antibody (positive control) or normal rabbit polyclonal IgG (negative control). Immunoprecipitated chromatin was analyzed by semi-quantitative PCR (A–E,G) or quantitative real-time PCR (F) . Relative levels of HBc, RNA polymerase II, acetyl H3, and HBV RNA were measured using ImageJ 1.46r. Representative data from three independent experiments are shown. Statistical significance in E and F was evaluated using Student’s t -test. * p < 0.05 (E) and exact p -values (F) relative to the corresponding controls are shown.
Article Snippet: Crosslinked sonicated chromatin was subjected to immunoprecipitation with 3 μg of rabbit monoclonal anti-PIN4 (Abcam #ab155283), mouse monoclonal anti-FLAG M2 (Sigma #F1804), rabbit polyclonal anti-HBc , mouse monoclonal anti-RNA polymerase II (Abcam #ab817), rabbit polyclonal anti-AcH3 (Merck Millipore #06–599), and rabbit polyclonal anti-H3 (Abcam #ab1791) antibodies or normal mouse or rabbit IgG (negative controls) for 16 h at 4°C, incubated with protein A/G-plus agarose beads (Santa Cruz Biotechnology #sc-2003) overnight at 4°C, and centrifuged at 1,000 g for 5 min at 4°C to recover immunoprecipitated protein–DNA complexes.
Techniques: Plasmid Preparation, Infection, Negative Control, Binding Assay, Transfection, Mutagenesis, Construct, Immunoprecipitation, Positive Control, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction